A FEW WORDS... Explainer on Nu.Q Test (from Ep 5)
- Feb 15
- 2 min read
Updated: Mar 28

* What it is: A plasma-based nucleosome assay used for cancer screening and monitoring in healthy, asymptomatic dogs only.
* What it isn't: A cancer-specific diagnostic test or a substitute for pathology.
* The Goal: It acts as a non-specific biomarker of pathological cell turnover.
* The Origin: Developed with the highly regarded Texas A&M Gastrointestinal Laboratory, the same team that did so much to establish B12, TLI and PLI testing within general practice.
🔬 The Biology: Why Nucleosomes?
* Normal Cells: Usually die via apoptosis; nucleosomes are degraded internally with minimal release into the blood.
* Aggressive Tumors: Often have high necrotic cell death and rapid proliferation.
* The Result: These "leaky" necrotic cells dump DNA-histone complexes (nucleosomes) into the circulation.
📊 Sensitivity Breakdown: Who to Test?
The test is most effective for high-turnover, systemic malignancies.
Circulating nucleosome test sensitivity varies by tumour type and reflects biological behaviour rather than diagnostic accuracy alone. Tumours with a high degree of necrosis, rapid cell turnover, or early systemic involvement are
more likely to produce detectable circulating nucleosomes.
Hemangiosarcoma shows the highest sensitivity (≥82%), consistent with its aggressive nature, high necrotic burden, and early systemic disease.
Lymphoma has a similarly high sensitivity (≥77%), reflecting marked metabolic activity and early systemic effects.
Histiocytic sarcoma demonstrates moderate sensitivity (≥54%), in keeping with intermediate proliferative and necrotic activity.
Malignant melanoma (not iridal melanoma) shows variable sensitivity (approximately 45%), which is strongly influenced by tumour site and stage at presentation.
Soft tissue sarcomas have low sensitivity (≈27%), as they are often localized and exhibit slower cellular turnover.
Mast cell tumours show the lowest sensitivity (≥20%), likely due to poor systemic release of nucleosomes despite malignant behaviour.
Clinically, a negative nucleosome result does not exclude neoplasia, particularly for tumour types that are biologically less likely to shed nucleosomes into the circulation.
> ️ Nu.Q® Vet has a 97% specificity, meaning false positives in healthy dogs are rare.
🐕 Case Selection
Don't test indiscriminately! Use a risk-based approach:
* Senior Dogs: Incorporate into annual screening for dogs ≥7-10 years old depending on breed and appropriate communication with owners.
* High-Risk Breeds: Potentially start earlier for Golden Retrievers, Labs, Boxers, GSDs, Rottweilers, and Flat-Coated Retrievers.
* Note: Low-grade/localized tumors like soft tissue sarcomas do not increase nucleosomes, so are not typically detected in this test.
🛑 What if the result is "Moderate"?
A moderate elevation requires vigilance, not an immediate diagnosis.
* Wait: Repeat the test in 2–4 weeks with a strict 24-hour fast.
* Transient Inflammation: Transient Inflammation could resolve and the subsequent test will therefore be negative.
* Investigate: If elevation persists, move to imaging: Thoracic X-rays, Abdominal Ultrasound.
* Budget: ensure the client is well aware of the costs of imaging and sedation, and the potential need for CT if nothing is detected on routine screening in practice.
🐱 Looking Ahead: Feline Nu.Q®
* Historically, feline lymphoma was difficult to detect with this method.
* New for 2026: A feline-specific assay has been reported with improved performance for lymphoma; clinical validation is ongoing.





Comments